On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:18 PM, John Siracusa wrote:

> Er, wasn't the original point of new_or_cached() to return a
> preexisting Rose::DB object, not a new Rose::DB object with a
> preexisting $dbh?  Maybe I'm mis-remembering...

That is what I remember too.

The problem that I had when using connect_cached was that if Rose::DB- 
 >new was called while another was inside a transaction, the  
transaction would be ended (cannot remember if it was rolledback or  
committed). new_or_cached was suggested to resolve that issue.

Graham.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to