On Oct 27, 2007, at 12:18 PM, John Siracusa wrote: > Er, wasn't the original point of new_or_cached() to return a > preexisting Rose::DB object, not a new Rose::DB object with a > preexisting $dbh? Maybe I'm mis-remembering...
That is what I remember too. The problem that I had when using connect_cached was that if Rose::DB- >new was called while another was inside a transaction, the transaction would be ended (cannot remember if it was rolledback or committed). new_or_cached was suggested to resolve that issue. Graham. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
