Jonathan Swartz wrote: Hi Jon
> We can't identify any recent changes to our code or to our Rose > libraries that would have triggered this, so we're suspecting certain > piece(s) of data in our database. I agree with your interpretation. Specifically, the bug has always been there, but now data happens to trigger a path thru the code which has not previously been exercised... So it's the usage of 'ne' that needs to be fixed. -- Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
