Jonathan Swartz wrote:

Hi Jon

> We can't identify any recent changes to our code or to our Rose  
> libraries that would have triggered this, so we're suspecting certain  
> piece(s) of data in our database.

I agree with your interpretation. Specifically, the bug has always been 
there, but now data happens to trigger a path thru the code which has 
not previously been exercised... So it's the usage of 'ne' that needs to 
be fixed.
-- 
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to