On 10/29/07 8:09 PM, Ron Savage wrote: > Jonathan Swartz wrote: >> We can't identify any recent changes to our code or to our Rose >> libraries that would have triggered this, so we're suspecting certain >> piece(s) of data in our database. > > I agree with your interpretation. Specifically, the bug has always been > there, but now data happens to trigger a path thru the code which has > not previously been exercised... So it's the usage of 'ne' that needs to > be fixed.
Er, if you mean the usage of "ne" in QueryBuilder, that code is executed constantly and is not going anywhere. My best guess is that the bug has something to do with the runtime environment (e.g., which classes are loaded and when), not the "data" (as in column values). -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
