Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 19.51 schrieb Chris Cannam: > Try the fix I committed to CVS an hour or so ago and > let me know how it looks.
It works now! Thank you! >And I actively prefer 1.0 > to 1.0.0 -- is there any real practical reason why that would be a > problem, or just a question of aesthetics? Gentoo needs a distinct version number for each update such that it will be merged automatically into the system. It depends on the numbering system. Is the development branch after 4.1.0 called 4.2.0? If so, no problem, bugfixes or backports will become 4.1.1, 4.1.2 and so on. But if the developkent branch will be called 4.1.1, the question is different: Will 4.1.0 be definitively frozen? If not, bugfixes could be named 4.1.0-r1, 4.1.0-r2 or the like, that would be ok, too. But it would be no good idea from the gentoo point of view to have identical filenames for different 1.0-rx releases. Compression (.bz2 or .gz) doesn't matter. Regards Toni PS: Dynamic IP assignment + Anti-Spam-War begins to become annoying, the last attempt to send this mail failed with Heute 10.55:27 �- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server: [email protected]; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system status) � � Remote MTA mail.sourceforge.net: network error �- SMTP protocol diagnostic: 550-"rejected because your SMTP server, 195.186.18.61, is in the Spamcop RBL.\r\n550 See http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml for more information." ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
