Chris Cannam wrote: > Any comments on this one? For a while I've been sitting on a script that > reshuffles the code in the gui/ directory of a Rosegarden tree into a set of > subdirectories, each with a potentially large set of source files that in > most cases have only one class per file. > [...] > Also something I've been thinking about :-) > So the question is, would a reorganisation like this be a good thing? Yes. > Would > it make the code easier or harder to work on? Easier IMHO. > Could it make it faster to > rebuild after modifications to small numbers of files? I don't know for sure. > What would a better > directory structure look like? > No idea, however I'm not comfortable with the idea of doing this in one huge pass. I'd much rather do it through a series of small changes, every time keeping the whole thing buildable and functional. E.g. create the gui/notation dir first, then the matrix one, and so on. Don't bother about svn copying the files, it would be just too cumbersome, and the history of deleted files is still available anyway.
-- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
