Chris Cannam wrote: > > I disagree. I think we should do it on a branch and attempt to get as much > as > possible automated up front. (My current script is not that far off > producing a buildable system.) It's not like we're going to be doing it all > by hand anyway, even if it is incremental -- there are 866 source files in > that listing -- and it's not that hard to establish when we've attained a > buildable and functional system. >
Doing it by small increments would preserve file history a bit more... but you're probably right, 866 files isn't very feasible. Before doing the split into one-class-per-file, we could already sort the current files into a better directory structure, though. -- Guillaume http://telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
