On Friday 04 September 2009, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > Seems like our svn tree does not fully obey the trunk-branches-tags pattern
Historically, we had a lot of different "modules" under CVS HEAD, and these remained in place after we switched to Subversion. We've moved most of these modules to a different layer of the directory structure, but left "rosegarden" where it historically was, so to check out "trunk" you're really checking out "trunk/rosegarden" (as opposed to, historically, "trunk/docs", "trunk/website" and so forth which were at the same level). I actually had "trunk/rosegarden" moved around so it was "trunk" for a day or so, but I did not like the change after all these years, and I put it back where it came from. There was plenty of noise going on about this at the time, and nobody ever complained about my decision to put it back where it came from. You can consider your complaint about our structure to be the opening of a new as yet unresolved discussion about this matter, but you MUST NOT go off and change this around on your own. Don't even think about it. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
