[Note to admins: resent with corrected from address] Hi Tom.
See my response to Julie's message for an argument for continuing with your proposal in a way (I believe) that won't cause irritation for those who want to keep the current behavior. :-) I really think my proposal won't bother those who want the current behavior. It does add an extra menu option, but I think that's a small deal. Anyone who disagrees, please speak up. The reason I'm arguing for this is that I like the proposed behavior, but I also like having both options easily available. Also, I tend to favor power over ease of use. (However, I don't believe my proposal takes away more than a milligram's worth of case of use.) Thanks. Jim On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:59:34 -0500 "Tom Breton (Tehom)" <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, the consensus seems to be that the overlapping display, while less > than ideal, is better than displaying on separate staffs, or provides > a valuable simultaneous view. > > Thank you, everybody. I'm glad I asked before coding any changes. > > Tom Breton (Tehom) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov > _______________________________________________ > Rosegarden-devel mailing list > [email protected] - use the link below to > unsubscribe > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
