I'll just add a final comment that although I favor the functionality Tom is considering adding, I won't whine if it ends up not being added. I realize there are some risks (complicating the interface, potentially introducing bugs, etc.); plus I don't feel my voice should have as much weight as people who contribute to the project, especially considering I've remained only an occasional user. (I hope to remedy that before too many years pass - it's just too useful a tool and there's so much I could do with it.) And - of course, this goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway - great thanks to all who have contributed to this powerful program.
Jim On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:49:02 -0500 "D. Michael McIntyre" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/08/2012 05:35 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > > > I will hold off on doing anything while I fully digest the idea. > > You're fooling around in an area where I have personally put a crap > ton of effort getting it how I wanted it, and I hold a powerful veto > pen here. > > Before I sign off on anything like this, I want a clear and detailed > proposal explaining what the problem is, why this solution is > necessary, and all that stuff. Plan first, code later. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_nov _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
