I would vote for the most precise and complete alternative, which, IMO, is "cycles per quarter note" - as long as that's a correct description of the feature, and I'm sure it is. (I've not used the feature, but it sounds like something I would use if I ever start using Rosegarden intensively.)
On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:39:17 -1000 david <[email protected]> wrote: > While I've never used the pitchbend dialog, just off the top of my > head, "cycles per quarter note" or "hertz" makes sense. Or even > "Vibrato frequency"? > > On 05/30/2013 07:53 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > > On the devel list, we're talking about how to make the pitchbend > > dialog clearer. > > > > If you use the pitchbend dialog, if the "Vibrato wavelength" field > > changed to "cycles per quarter note" or "hertz", would that be > > easier or harder for you to use? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom Breton (Tehom) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
