> On Thu, 30 May 2013 18:23:38 -0500
> Jim Cochrane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would vote for the most precise and complete alternative, which,
>> IMO, is "cycles per quarter note" - as long as that's a correct
>> description of the feature, and I'm sure it is. (I've not used the
>> feature, but it sounds like something I would use if I ever start
>> using Rosegarden intensively.)
> [...]
> I'm having second thoughts on this - The functionality is to use
> pitchbend to set up a periodic rate for a vibrato effect, right?
Right.
> [...]
> So I think I change my vote to hertz, although for those who might have
> forgotten what hertz is, perhaps just "cycles per second".
That makes sense.
> However,
> this appears to imply a choice of two different implementations, as
> well as the naming choice, since, e.g., 10 Hz is twice as slow as 10
> cycles per quarter note at q=120 bpm. I suppose this just amounts to
> doing a calculation/conversion for the UI for one of the choices, so I
> suspect it's not a big deal.
Right, it's pretty easy to convert.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
