On 28/04/2014 23:43, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 04/28/2014 05:24 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > >> On the other hand fluidsynth (from command line) responds correctly to >> the reverb (and chorus) control changes. > > Thanks for looking into this, Lorenzo. QSynth does have its own reverb > and chorus knobs built into the GUI. It makes a certain kind of sense > that they would implement these as global parameters and ignore per > channel controllers.
mhh I'm not really sure about that, but I see a use case for it. It seems the Qsynth controls "mimic" the fluidsynth parameters, but ignore channel events. Otherwise you could send conflicting messages on > the channels and have your GUI reflecting one thing and your synth > engine playing something entirely different. > > Looks like using fluidsynth from the command line is the way to go to > get this to work as expected then. That's good information to > disseminate. Thanks. > Yes.. I'd also point out the possibility to route the audio output of the synth to many of the (nice) reverbs available (LADSPA or whatever (or if you use fluidsynth directly as a synth in Rosegarden just add it to the track..) Lorenzo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
