> On Feb 23, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote on 23/02/2020 13:06:
>> I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
>> to "inject" invalids.
>> The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
>> case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.
> 
> Jordi,
> 
> You're splitting hairs here.  The end result is the same.

I’m cornered about something like this as we’ve been down this road before with 
bogon lists, etc and even though it’s well intentioned by smart people(tm), the 
distributed legacy and cleanup has often taken years to recover.

- Jared

Reply via email to