> I don't think is objective to say that the proposal as asking the NCC
> to "inject" invalids.
> 
> The proposal is providing the information of the invalids (in this
> case unallocated/unassigned) by means of RPKI.

ok.  i was kind of on the fence.  but american press has made me
oversensitive to fake language such as this; so it threw me over the
edge.  i do not support the proposal.

randy

Reply via email to