On 2009-01-04 01:31, Tony Li wrote: > > > |> Seems not unreasonable to me. Since our current > |architecture can't support > |> that kind of multi-homing load, we're trying to avoid the load. > | > |Now wait a minute; Brian just told us that we can't say with any > |scientific or engineering certainty what kind of multihoming load the > |current architecture can or can't support. Which is it? Can we? Or > |can't we? > > > We already know that we're growing the table faster than technology can keep > up. That much is clear. > > > |You follow the logical inconsistency, right? > > > If you're expecting Brian and I to be consistent, I have a bridge to sell > you. ;-)
I will expect commission on that deal. However, the fact that the esteemed Mr Li and the esteemed Mr Callon appear to disagree supports my assertion that we don't know when we'll hit the wall. We do know it's two years closer than it was at the RAWS workshop, though, so the conclusion that we need a solution in hand stands, IMHO. Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
