On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, David Conrad wrote:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 8:05 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
This has received criticism that a host-based model causes more
signalling/reachability testing traffic than the tunnel-router-based one.
What's the basis for thinking this, and are there any good studies/data to
back it up? Intuitively, it doesn't seem like it should be so, to any
significant degree at least.
Well, for one thing, a tunnel-router-based solution would typically cover
some number of hosts.
Ok, sure.
I assumed there was an implied ", to a significant enough extent for
it to matter" at the end of the sentence I quoted. It seems
reasonable to assume that, for without it the criticism can be
dismissed straight away.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
That must be wonderful: I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
