On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Xu Xiaohu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think having a focused group that can work out some of the >> large scale deployment, operations and design issues with >> this bit of technology would be helpful. > > I agree. > >> I think that 'LISP' is a might narrow though, there are other >> map/encap solutions which may work as well. I'd like to see >> how something like map/encap works, and if it shows itself to >> be helpful. > > Exactly. The to-be-formed WG should not only focus on LISP, but also focus > on other map&encap solutions. Just as Yakov etc. pointed out, there are > still some open issues in LISP need to be answered. If many different > map&encaps solutions can be explored further simultaneously under this WG > charter, we may find they are complementary and can be converged finally to > form a successful short-term solution.
they might also feedback into RRG as inputs useful to the discussion William's been putting together... -Chris _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
