Fred, > Not meaning to pick on you, but I don't understand why RANGER > hasn't made it onto the "short list" of proposals yet; maybe > you could answer that for me? AFAICT, RANGER is in the top-two > map/encaps proposals in terms of technical completeness (maybe > even the top-one) so can we have folks add it to their lists?
I just noticed that the reference repository doesn't have
a reference.I-D.draft-templin-ranger.xml. I built the one
below (but haven't submitted it). Let me know if its ok.
Dave
---
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<reference anchor='I-D.templin-ranger>
<front>
<title>Routing and Addressing in Next-Generation EnteRprises (RANGER)</title>
<author initials='F' surname='Templin' fullname='Fred Templin'>
<organization />
</author>
<date month='January' day='19' year='2009' />
<abstract><t>
Next-generation enterprise networks including the global Internet
itself will require an architected solution for the coordination of
internal routing and addressing plans and with accommodations for
Provider-Independent (PI) addressing, scalability, mobility, multi-
homing and security. Additionally, next-generation networks will
require support for both Internet protocol versions (IPv4 and IPv6)
for an indeterminant period; perhaps even indefinitely. These
considerations are particularly true for existing deployments, but
the same principles apply even for clean-slate approaches. The
RANGER architecture addresses these requirements, and provides a
comprehensive framework for IPv6/IPv4 coexistence.
</t></abstract>
</front>
<seriesInfo name='Internet-Draft' value='draft-templin-ranger-06' />
<format type='TXT'
target='http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-ranger-06.txt' />
</reference>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
