My point is that this is not a standards activity. I question whether rough consensus is even a good idea in a research environment. That a few people agree on terms is sufficient for *THEM* to collaborate together. That others do not agree may be sufficient for those others to collaborate, and let the best research win.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to