On 10/26/09 3:36 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
- NAT is now architecture.  The IETF needs to decide how much NAT it
   wants the Internet to have in the future.  This strongly influences
   what we do in routing/addressing, because outlying, dwindling cases
   (either the NAT ones or the non-NAT ones) can be handled specially.


Do people believe that a scalable bidirectional connection model is something that the layer 3 architecture (a) should support and (b) does support under the above constraint?

Eliot

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to