On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Scott Brim <[email protected]> wrote: > Eliot Lear allegedly wrote on 10/27/2009 12:12 PM: >> On 10/26/09 3:36 PM, Scott Brim wrote: >>> - NAT is now architecture. The IETF needs to decide how much NAT it >>> wants the Internet to have in the future. This strongly influences >>> what we do in routing/addressing, because outlying, dwindling cases >>> (either the NAT ones or the non-NAT ones) can be handled specially. >> >> Do people believe that a scalable bidirectional connection model is >> something that the layer 3 architecture (a) should support and (b) does >> support under the above constraint? > > If I understand correctly, I believe it is fundamentally important. > However, it can be handled through various dynamic lookup services (e.g. > DNS), no? >
I agree and find this approach very interesting - then is this a layer 3 issue or the next layer? -- patte _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
