On 2009-11-16 21:01, Michael Menth wrote: > if NAT66 is an option
Can you define "NAT66" precisely? The only precise proposal I am aware of is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mrw-behave-nat66 (which I should stress is *not* an IETF WG document, despite its name). That is a stateless, non-reversible NAT. Brian _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
