William Herrin schrieb:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Michael Menth
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Michael Menth
<[email protected]> wrote:
We need the a box that translates local IPv6 addresses into global IPv6
addresses using a stateless NAT using a one-to-one reversible mapping
algorithm for single-homed edge networks. That is precisely what NAT66 as
described in the draft does according to our understanding.
In case of multihomed edge networks, there is a 1:n mapping from IDs (or
unique local address) to global routing locators (or RLOCs in general, or
global addresses). To be backwards-compatible with the classic IPv6
Internet, return packets of a connection should use the same global
addresses. GLI-Split proposes two different features that achieve this. One
is a stateful NAT for communication with classic IPv6 hosts inside a
GLI-domain, the other is based on IPv6 extension headers for communication
with upgraded GLI-hosts.

Hi Michael,

You have essentially the same problem when both edge networks are
multihomed and talking to each other, not just when you're trying to
talk to the legacy Internet. Then you have to deal with
application-level DNS problems trying to deal with multiple candidate
addresses some of which might not represent functional paths at the
moment...

Yes, it's the same problem on both sides. Upgraded host would solve that problem, in the meantime, gateways could fix it using the technique pointed out earlier.

Regards,

   Michael

 I think that it touches a fundamental problem of
 Loc/ID split solutions based on address rewriting when hosts have only a
single local address but their edge network is multhomed to the outside
world.

Right.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



--
Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science
Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
phone: (+49)-931/31-86644 (new), fax: (+49)-931/888-6632
mailto:[email protected]
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to