In einer eMail vom 11.03.2010 23:08:42 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt fred.l.temp...@boeing.com:
So, I have to agree that LISP is not really achieving a true locator/identifier split. The LISP EID IMHO would be more accurately renamed as "Endpoint Interface iDentifeir", and the LISP acronym itself seems a bit misleading. Already long ago and also a couple of times I said that LISP is a two loose hops forwarding concept rather than a loc/id-split protocol. But not to disqualify LISP (there are other defficiencies). As a matter of fact LISP tries to do something for routing - and not for separating IP and TCP/UDP. I wonder, that this is suddenly, a (big?) topic. No one responded my respective comments long ago. Right now I consider this is as useless shadow boxing. Heiner
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
