Hi Tony, Is there a so strict deadline for submitting a RRG recommendation that makes the RRG (co-chairs) to make such a hurried recommedation for a scalable routing and addressing architecture which is deemed to be useful in a long period of time?
Is it reasonable to give us some time (e.g., three or four months) to argue against these candidate solutions so that we can realize whether or not all of them deserve the recommendation? Best regards, Xiaohu ----- 原邮件 ----- 发件人: Tony Li <[email protected]> 日期: 星期五, 三月 26日, 2010 下午2:13 主题: Re: [rrg] Recommendation 收件人: Scott Brim <[email protected]>, Noel Chiappa <[email protected]> 抄送: Tony Li <[email protected]>, [email protected] > > > > >>> the recommendation of the [chairs of the] RRG > >> > >> IFYP. > > > > ? > > > I grep'ed for that and came up with things that didn't make sense. > I > suspect that Noel meant "IF You Please". > > While there is no argument that this is not a consensus based > recommendation, IRTF outcomes are not required to be consensus > based. So > while Noel's amended version is correct, the original is also correct. > > Just so we're all clear, I'm very disappointed that we were unable > to make > further progress in reaching consensus. > > Tony > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg > _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
