In einer eMail vom 29.03.2010 10:08:39 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt  
[email protected]:

The  current recommendation is RRG's Chairs recommendation and not RRG's  
recommendation.

This should be clearly said in the final  document.

Luigi



I think the same.
Lixia, why don't you offer any better prefix aggregation techniques to the  
idr-WG ?
Tony, why don't you offer ILNP to any IPv6-WG?
>From the discussion on this RRG-mailing list I leant that IPv6 is the  only 
 area that has no problem with renumbering. So IPv6-folks  would be happy 
to renumber according to ILNP. 
 
But this group is supposed to come up with an architecture  which serves 
first of all IPv4, and whichever address family else in  addition.
Heiner
 
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to