By the way I would also change the title of the document.

Now it is "Recommendation for a Routing Architecture", but the document does 
not contain any "architectural" recommendation.
AIS and renumbering are not an "architecture". 
ILNP  is a protocol (based on the Loc/ID split paradigm/architecture, but still 
a protocol).

Luigi   


On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:08 , Luigi Iannone wrote:

> I agree with Joel.
> 
> The current recommendation is RRG's Chairs recommendation and not RRG's 
> recommendation.
> 
> This should be clearly said in the final document.
> 
> Luigi
> 
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 22:21 , Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> 
>> I would have to disagree slightly.
>> I do not believe that you can represent this as the recommendation of the 
>> Research Group.
>> The document can be published as an RRG RFC with a recommendation from the 
>> chairs of the RRG.  But the conclusion (whether I agree or disagree with it) 
>> is not the recommendation of the RRG.
>> 
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>> 
>> 
>> Tony Li wrote:
>>>>>> the recommendation of the [chairs of the] RRG
>>>>> IFYP.
>>>> ?
>>> I grep'ed for that and came up with things that didn't make sense.  I
>>> suspect that Noel meant "IF You Please".
>>> While there is no argument that this is not a consensus based
>>> recommendation, IRTF outcomes are not required to be consensus based.  So
>>> while Noel's amended version is correct, the original is also correct.
>>> Just so we're all clear, I'm very disappointed that we were unable to make
>>> further progress in reaching consensus.
>>> Tony
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>> _______________________________________________
>> rrg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to