+1
Dino
On Mar 29, 2010, at 7:51 AM, [email protected] wrote:
In einer eMail vom 29.03.2010 10:08:39 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit
schreibt [email protected]:
The current recommendation is RRG's Chairs recommendation and not
RRG's recommendation.
This should be clearly said in the final document.
Luigi
I think the same.
Lixia, why don't you offer any better prefix aggregation techniques
to the idr-WG ?
Tony, why don't you offer ILNP to any IPv6-WG?
From the discussion on this RRG-mailing list I leant that IPv6 is
the only area that has no problem with renumbering. So IPv6-folks
would be happy to renumber according to ILNP.
But this group is supposed to come up with an architecture which
serves first of all IPv4, and whichever address family else in
addition.
Heiner
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
