> Agreed. It would seem to be at the very least misleading
> not to make it clear that this recommendation did not
> result from a consensus process in the RRG, but rather
> was the opinion of the chairs.


Folks,

Chill.

There is no intent or implication to represent this as a consensus result.
This will be very clear in the final text (which isn't even drafted yet) and
will be sent around for review.

Regards,
Tony


_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to