> 
> 
> There is no intent or implication to represent this as a consensus result.
> This will be very clear in the final text (which isn't even drafted yet) and
> will be sent around for review.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 

Tony,

Thanks for making this clear, I think it was ambiguous based on the RRG 
presentation Friday.  I Look forward to reviewing the document.

-Darrel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to