>> "This is a product of the IRTF Routing RG." >> >> This is incorrect. [...] >> >> ILNP is no more a "product of the RRG" than Ivip or any other >> architecture which has been developed and discussed on the list in >> the last 3 years. > > I would tend to agree. This having been said, I would be in favor of > publication of all of the ILNP documents as experimental, just as I > would be in favor of all IVIP, LISP, and similar proposals as > experimental, and as far as I'm concerned, as long as there's > consistency of approach about the above statement, I'd be fine either way.
Hi guys, There's some misunderstanding here. First, we'll be working towards publication of any proposal that cares to do the work to have their proposal published. A number of people have already started down that path. Second, all of these proposals are products of the RRG. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
