Hi Tom, You wrote:
>> In future years I intend to write up Ivip and DRTM more thoroughly >> and hopefully write some code for a test network. Until then, please >> see: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/current/msg06823.html >> >> in response to Tom Petch (msg06831) regarding his suggestion I write >> RFCs for the CES/CEE distinction and for DRTM. > > I know; a request for an RFC is not the same as a detailed critique of the > I-D but it almost counts as a comment on the I-D. Thanks - you made a significant positive comment: that you regard these things as valuable enough that you want to see them written up well and published as RFCs. Also, I am encouraged by recent correspondence with Fred Templin. I understand that the mobility section of his next revision of IRON will be based on TTR Mobility. I guess there is reluctance amongst many people to invest a lot of time reading material from someone like me who is relatively new to the field and who none of you have met in person. But as the years pass, I guess encrustation and weathering will make Ivip, DRTM and TTR Mobility look as established as old barnacles such as Loc/ID Separation - and so worthy of more serious consideration. - Robin _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
