ok ok ... Tony, make it "deployed capabilities"?
On 11/03/2010 10:24 EDT, RJ Atkinson wrote: > > On 03 Nov 2010, at 11:00 , Tony Li wrote: >> Quick searches of three different dictionaries >> (webster.com, dictionary.com, Apple's dictionary widget) >> show that functionality is well defined. > > Merriam-Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/functionality) > indicates in its definition that "functionality" has > "capabilities" as a synonym. > > Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/functionality) > uses "capable" in its 2nd definition for "functional". > In turn, the 1st definition of "functionality" there > references the definition for "functional". > > Your note indicated that you did not think "capabilities" > was a synonym for "functionality". This begs the question > of what the Design Goals text means when it uses that word, > since you indicated that "capabilities" is not the > intended meaning. > >> I'm happy to try to clarify, ... > > Thanks very much, > > Ran > > > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
