Ben Mabey wrote:
Mark Wilden wrote:
That reminds me: Was there a reason for using <file>:<line> to run a
feature at a line instead of spec's -l <line> ?
///ark
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I think it was to keep in line with how Cucumber outputs the backtrace
in the CLI. So you can simply copy and paste the line from the output
to run just that one scenario.
I actually much prefer the concise notation and I would like to see
RSpec adopt it.
Exactly as Ben said. In addition it was also used as it made it nicer
when running multiple lines in the same file
file:10:11:14:15
--
Joseph Wilk
http://blog.josephwilk.net
-Ben
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
