David Chelimsky wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ben Mabey <b...@benmabey.com> wrote:
Mark Wilden wrote:
That reminds me: Was there a reason for using <file>:<line> to run a
feature at a line instead of spec's -l <line> ?
///ark
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I think it was to keep in line with how Cucumber outputs the backtrace in
the CLI. So you can simply copy and paste the line from the output to run
just that one scenario.
I actually much prefer the concise notation and I would like to see RSpec
adopt it.
I agree. RSpec will adopt it as soon as it receives your patch :)
I really need to stop suggesting things on this list... :)
-Ben
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
