On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Ben Mabey <b...@benmabey.com> wrote: > David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ben Mabey <b...@benmabey.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Mark Wilden wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> That reminds me: Was there a reason for using <file>:<line> to run a >>>> feature at a line instead of spec's -l <line> ? >>>> >>>> ///ark >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I think it was to keep in line with how Cucumber outputs the backtrace in >>> the CLI. So you can simply copy and paste the line from the output to >>> run >>> just that one scenario. >>> >>> I actually much prefer the concise notation and I would like to see RSpec >>> adopt it. >>> >> >> I agree. RSpec will adopt it as soon as it receives your patch :) >> > > I really need to stop suggesting things on this list... :)
:) _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
