On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ben Mabey <b...@benmabey.com> wrote: > Mark Wilden wrote: >> >> That reminds me: Was there a reason for using <file>:<line> to run a >> feature at a line instead of spec's -l <line> ? >> >> ///ark >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > I think it was to keep in line with how Cucumber outputs the backtrace in > the CLI. So you can simply copy and paste the line from the output to run > just that one scenario. > > I actually much prefer the concise notation and I would like to see RSpec > adopt it.
I agree. RSpec will adopt it as soon as it receives your patch :) > > -Ben > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
