Hi Jean,
At 02:58 PM 17-12-2024, Jean Mahoney wrote:
Here's my attempt to identify policy items with regards to an errata
system. All of these are up for discussion.
o There shall be an avenue for readers to report errors.
o The reporting process shall be available for [ all RFCs | a
subset of RFCs depending on RFC status ].
o The reporting process shall be transparent.
o Corrections shall be reviewed and approved by [ stream
managers | RPC | chairs | review team(s) | crowd source ] depending
on [ error type | stream ].
o Review and approval procedures [ may | may not ] be defined
by each stream.
o Review and approval [ may | may not ] be delegated.
o The corrections shall be shown [ inline | on a separate page ].
Thank you for listing the above policy item. It is a good starting point.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
