On 19/12/2024 07:50, S Moonesamy wrote:
  Section 3 also argues for some form of voting. I doubt that it would work to my advantage as I don't have a fan club. :-)

The word voting seems to cause responses, which I guess is a good thing,
in an IETF context.

What's referred to in the draft is *not* voting, but the kind of up/down
voting e.g. as used on stackexchange etc, and that is only used to
reduce the number of things that are brought to the attention of those
who would need to spend effort figuring out if a reported erratum is
real or not. After that, whatever stream-specific approval processes
would follow.

Cheers,
S.


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to