On 19/12/2024 14:11, Carsten Bormann wrote:
Maybe we need to have a bit of revision control on the text that finally is approved and goes into the RFC? (Also, the explanation why this change was needed, including any new specific examples, needs to go somewhere.)
Right. As ekr said, a lot of the pre-approval discussion/steps are very like issue/PR processing on github (MR on gitlab). That's also how I think about those steps. S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
