On 20-Dec-24 11:20, S Moonesamy wrote:
Hi Stephen,
At 05:00 AM 19-12-2024, Stephen Farrell wrote:
The word voting seems to cause responses, which I guess is a good thing,
in an IETF context.
:-)
What's referred to in the draft is *not* voting, but the kind of up/down
voting e.g. as used on stackexchange etc, and that is only used to
reduce the number of things that are brought to the attention of those
who would need to spend effort figuring out if a reported erratum is
real or not. After that, whatever stream-specific approval processes
would follow.
It's worth a try. It's better to drop an errata report instead of
leaving it unprocessed for years.
Why? What if it describes a serious problem? How do we know that the 4
open reports from 2010 are of no value without looking at them?
Brian
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
