On 10-Jun-26 01:43, Scott Bradner wrote:
in section 6 you say ... In some cases it may be included even if the person acknowledged objects, for example if they made a suggestion that might later be viewed as prior art.I do not understand the reference to "prior art" - why would that be a problem?
I should probably drop this anyway, because the draft says that IPR is out of scope. That text was in my original (2015) draft and reading it now, I think it's nonsense!
in section 9 - the "AI not listed as an author" bullet overlaps the open issue bullet and they should be combined if the open issue bullet is included
Yes, I can fix that depending on how we resolve the open issue. Thanks Brian -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
