Hi Brian,
At 01:09 AM 09-06-2026, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Please read this version, as it attempts to roll up everything I've
seen that's in scope. There's not much point in commenting on what you
didn't like about version 01, because those are exactly the things
that I've changed.
I request the chairs to consider an adoption call for this version,
even though there are two very explicit open issues in the text.
(I'm biased on both of them.)
1. Sixty days have elapsed since the initial version of the draft was
submitted. Nobody else came up with an alternative to your proposal.
2. Some of the issues which were raised during the discussions are
matters who could be handled through the procedure set for the RFC
Series.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]