I don't think draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics is ready for RSWG adoption yet, but for a reason different than what Rich gave (and I agree with some of his points!).
Some parts of draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics give policy about RFC publication, which makes sense for this WG. Other parts are about what should not happen in Internet Drafts, which is very much out of scope for this WG. I tried untangling some of those specifications for drafts, and was not able to do easily. Maybe others can suggest text that does so, but until the draft is clearly only about RFC policy, it should not be adopted in the WG. --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
