RB, David,

thanks for the kind words :-). More inline below...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 9:35 PM
> To: rsyslog-users
> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] new config parser out...
> 
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, RB wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:12, RB <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The sooner a developer realizes they can't please everyone, the more
> >> quickly they can move on and actually get things done.  I personally
> >> would have preferred a wholesale abandonment of the decades-old
> >> heritage, but can appreciate the utility to others and its
> simplicity.
> >>  As Torvalds said, "... what's the point of being in charge if you
> >> can't pick the bike shed color without holding a referendum on it?
> So
> >> I'm just going all alpha-male, and just renumbering it. You'll like
> >> it."
> >
> > Actually, having now read the blog entry fully (and shamelessly
> > self-responding), I can't say I have any complaints about the new
> > stuff.  Every item you touch on was a concern of mine, and I frankly
> > can't think of any others.  The Perl-ish use of '$' to designate
> > variables still feels odd in a non-programming environment, but it's
> > not enough to complain about.
> >
> > The readability quotient is indeed being significantly raised - in
> > particular, visual and logical blocking have taken a large leap
> > forward.  Congratulations, and thank you for your continued work!
> 
> looks good to me.
> 
> as far as the perl-ish use of '$', in many ways this is becoming a
> programming environment, especially if there is going to be the ability
> to
> define our own properties (i.e. variables) in the future (something I
> think I remember reading)

This is not on my current TODO list, but definitely possible with the new
system. It would make sense to get some actual use cases, so that I can begin
to model it into the longer term todo.

Rainer
> 
> most people won't make use of this sort of sophisticated logic, but for
> those that do it sure seems to make things much better than they were
> before.
> 
> David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to