mmhhh... you may want to try attached patch. It's against current master,
but should apply cleanly. It's totally untested, but there is a90% chance
it is the valid fix.

Rainer


On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Rainer Gerhards
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Boylan, James <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Certainly can! I finally broke down and setup a test environment
>> specifically for testing dev versions and such. Give me the git URL and I
>> can test it.
>>  <[email protected]>
>>
>
> excellent, but now that I look closer, I guess I already see the bug. The
> instrumenttion wasn't that bad at all, one just needs a couple of minutes
> of concentration. I do not yet have a fix, but I think I know what's going
> on and will check how to address it. I haven't touched that code some
> while, so I must read a little bit not to introduce a regression ;) But I
> hope I can send you something for testing tomorrow. Ping me if you don't
> hear from me.
>
> Rainer
>

Attachment: func.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to