Cool! It looks like we've switched to let's-do-something mode :)

Luckily it looks like I have some rsyslog-related work ahead of me and I
hope I can contribute back as much of that as possible (especially
ES-related stuff). I can't make any promises, but definitely those
discussions and suggestions help a lot.

2013/12/13 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Radu Gheorghe <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > 2013/12/13 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Radu Gheorghe <
> [email protected]
> > > > Cool: activity -> awareness -> hopefully more contributors. You're
> > > > giving me access rights to contribute documentation. Cool: easier for
> > me
> > > to
> > > > contribute -> more contributions from me -> more awareness ->
> hopefully
> > > > more contributors. You've explained that you accept contributions,
> how
> > > > Adiscon works and what drives rsyslog development. Cool: people have
> > more
> > > > confidence that the project is "open", are more aware of how they can
> > > > contribute -> hopefully more contributors. I can go on for a while.
> > > >
> > > > The bad news is that all this requires people to invest time. It not
> > free
> > > > for you to do all this, it's not free for me to contribute, it's not
> > free
> > > > for any of us to brainstorm (more or less constructively) like we did
> > in
> > > > the recent threads. But it doesn't need to be "all or nothing", I
> thing
> > > > small stuff, small optimizations add up. And I hope this will pay off
> > in
> > > > the long run.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's sometimes hard to see this "outside picture", especially if you
> are
> > > highly tied in to some other activities. Again, this is why I
> appreciate
> > > these comments so much. I'll definitely give it anyother try.
> > >
> > > There are some days left before the holiday break, and maybe that's the
> > > thing to concentrate on now. Actually, it may be worth putting down
> > > development for a couple of weeks in order to tackle that beast. If doc
> > and
> > > these things are actually the top problem for rsyslog to reach it's
> > > potential, fixing that probably helps much more than new features. I
> have
> > > to admit I don't like to do (that kind of) doc, and I am not good and
> > > relatively slow at it, but it may be the thing that needs to go on top
> of
> > > the TODO list...
> > >
> > >
> > Not trying to put you off or anything, but I'm wondering if maybe instead
> > of writing documentation, your effort would be better invested in making
> it
> > easier for others to contribute docs.
> >
>
> I will probably try to get some RST generation mechanism in place, which
> would be a very good starting point. That, however, boils down to another
> autotools project, which always is a nightmare for me and takes eternally
> ... until Michael comes by again and again and fixes my mess. But for this
> to make sense, doc needs to be converted etc. As I can't ask Adiscon to pay
> someone else to do that, that's obviously something that needs to go into
> my non-paid work budget...
>
>
> >
> > And when I'm saying "wondering", I really mean I don't know what's best.
> > Because on the other hand, you're the one writing most of the code, and
> you
> > know what to write in the docs :)
> >
>
> that's only partially true. For all, I can't iterate enough that I am NOT
> GOOD AT writing NON-EXPERT doc. This is the area rsyslog doc lacks much.
>
> Also, I don't know anything about the hot topics of how to tune /connect
> to/ mange with things like ES. While I accept everything, I am
> unfortunately not that super-guru that knows the ins and outs of
> everything. And... oh wonder, this is the other area where the rsyslog doc
> is very bad. Think what you mentioned yourself about ES and logstash and
> folks not even knowing rsyslog supports it. OF course, I can write a
> "rsyslog does ES" post on the homepage, but will that weak content attract
> folks? For sure not.
>
> So now it's time to ask your company if they are serious in contributing
> back and giving you a couple of free days to work on that. You got the
> access permissons, Florian is ready to help you get going if that's
> required ... so it's totally in YOUR hands ;) Is your company open enough
> to support that? Does it thrash schedules and priorities like we do when
> important topics come up? Think about how quickly we acted on what was
> discussed yesterday -- because it makes sense. Not bashing, but ust taking
> your and Otis' comments seriously.
>
>
> >
> > This is more complicated than even optimistic-me anticipated...
> >
>
> Welcome in the real life ;) I try to find a balance in the real rsyslog
> world for 10 yrs now, and it's always the same...
>
> Rainer
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to