On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
2016-11-23 16:39 GMT+01:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
github wiki seems to be the correct place. could you create a _draft_
project repo for eRk ?
Open question to the community: does it really make sense to create a
new repo at this stage?
considering rsyslog is a Rocket-fast SYStem for LOG processing
http://www.rsyslog.com
perhaps we could use a development codename until a popular/commercial name
is found
what about: logwalk? (I really don't care, but I feel this ERK idea is
getting traction...)
Name + Scope
I mean this project will NOT host rsyslog code, so what will it host?
gut feeling: wouldn't it better to start by just documenting the
project goals on rsyslog wiki and after that decide of how to move
forward. Just an idea... I don't think my vote counts more than anyone
elses...
The only reason for having a different repo is for experimentation, but I don't
see why we can't experiment in a wiki for the current repos. Worst case we copy
the content elsewhere and turn them off.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
