> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:47:49 -0500 > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > To: Thomas Sibley <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [rt-users] Perl conflicts > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:25:31AM -0700, Thomas Sibley wrote: >> On 10/31/2012 09:45 AM, Ram wrote: >> > Any other ideas? >> >> It's worlds-apart easier and less error prone to use an entirely >> separate perl build instead of just a separate perl lib path. See perlbrew. >> > > +1 It is much, much easier and basically foolproof. Using the separate > perl lib path is definitely harder to get right and requires more package > config jiggering. From most to least work: > > 1. system perl + CPAN > 2. RT specific perl + CPAN > 3. RT specific perl lib path + CPAN + config tweaking > > Cheers, > Ken
Thanks again Ken. Looks like #2 is the way we're going. Ram -------- We're hiring! http://bestpractical.com/jobs
