Hi Martin,
apologies for the delay. Yes, this text left after active-tails document
was spawned. Would the following be acceptable:
Poll (P)
Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence, or 0 if
not.
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Martin Vigoureux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Greg,
>
> looking back in the doc I found:
> Poll (P)
>
> Set to 1 if the local system is sending a Poll Sequence or is a
> session of type MultipointHead soliciting the identities of the
> tails, or 0 if not.
>
> This looks to me as not being in line with the rest of the document,
> especially the part on "MultipointHead soliciting the identities of the
> tails".
> Am I right in thinking that this anticipates on
> draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail ?
>
> If so, please clarify this in the doc; if not, please correct me.
>
> Thanks
> -m
>
> Le 2018-05-15 à 1:09, Greg Mirsky a écrit :
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> thank you for the most expedient response. Both updates are in the new
>> working version.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Greg
>>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Michael Richardson <
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Greg Mirsky <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>> > The text that follows the first sentence in section 4.13.1 is
>> the
>> > replacement of the entire section 6.8.6 of RFC 5880. Would
>> stressing that
>> > make the relationship more clear, e.g.:
>>
>> txt> The following procedure replaces the entire section 6.8.6
>> of [RFC5880].
>>
>> > And the same can be applied to the first sentence in section
>> 14.3.3:
>>
>> txt> The following procedure replaces the entire section 6.8.7
>> of [RFC5880].
>>
>> That seems like good text.
>>
>> -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6
>> mesh
>> networks [
>> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network
>> architect [
>> ] [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
>>
>>
>>
